I applaud Datuk Nazir Razak and this resonates with a call – let's have more brave leaders. No more hiding behind the government, monopolies and protectionism.

Shortly after I posted my views on innovation I was thrilled to read CIMB Group CEO, Datuk Nazir Razak's bold comments on how the government should show economic leadership in these trying times. Among his suggestions that really stuck with me were the review of the New Economic Policy (NEP), how the government should venture out to acquire companies and brand names abroad and how Malaysia can attract the best talent.

When I think about it, I see Nazir's comments reflect the ideals and philosophy behind Singapore's Temasek Holdings. Although government-owned, they do mean business when it comes to the way they operate. The sort of returns on investment they generate each year bear testament to that (yes, yes, I am aware of the big hit they’ve taken in the current downturn but you know what I mean). But it was the recent decision to appoint Chip Goodyear, an American and former BHP Billiton boss, as the new CEO that demonstrates how serious they are about running Temasek like a real business.

Like all Fortune 500 companies, Temasek casts its net wide and makes sure it lures the best and the brightest. I take my AirAsia cap off to the Singaporeans for this. They may have a reputation for being ultra-straight-laced and total conformists but this is one radical trail-blazing move for all Sovereign Wealth Funds and State-backed companies everywhere to try and emulate.

Chip Goodyear

Now wouldn't it be great if our GLCs took the same tack when hiring for the top posts? We needn't even have to look beyond our borders: Malaysia has a large and deep enough talent pool to supply a multitude of leadership candidates who can help our GLC’s compete on the world stage. I really cannot agree more with Nazir's call for the review and restructuring of the NEP. It is probably the single most important factor that is preventing Malaysia moving from good to great. I realize the important role it has played in narrowing the economic divide between races. But there is empirical evidence to show that there has been little incremental benefit over the past two decades. It's a 39-year-old machine that is broken, running on empty and which desperately needs to be fixed.

And here’s no better time to do it than now. The global economic turmoil presents a golden opportunity to embrace change (apologies to Obama). Think of it this way: The economic pie is already shrinking at home and if we don't fix our fundamental problems of improving our education system, nurturing talent, and rewarding the best minds the pie will shrink even more. We must have the courage to seize this opportunity to truly reform.

These are all the values that we aim to promote in AirAsia. We try our best to make our staff aware that opportunities are always there for them to switch careers or take on more responsibility or become leaders, as long as they have the desire and the passion to work towards their goals. Some of our cabin crew have moved into the marketing divisions and some who've had enough of pencil-pushing in accounts have taken up the challenge to fulfill their life-long dream to be a pilot!

Someday when I am too old and have to step down from my position as CEO, we will have to hunt for a new chief for AirAsia too. If the new boss was Malaysian, that would be a bonus but regardless of his or her race, class, religion or nationality, I have no doubt that we'll be cherry-picking only from amongst best.

The answer is meritocracy. That's what Datuk Nazir is talking about, and what Temasek is practicing when it chose Chip Goodyear. It’s what globally-minded private corporations practice as well in hiring their most senior managers (think Sony, Pepsi, Toyota, Coca-Cola, and Nissan). It’s what the World Bank did when it appointed Justin Yifu Lin from China as its chief economist – one of the most influential positions in the global economic hierarchy.

Let’s make a start down this road in Malaysia. We don’t even need to go outside our borders. We have so many talented and creative Malaysians right here at home. Let’s use them all. We must ensure that these talent remain here and is not lost to those poaching the best. This is a call for Malaysian companies to be more efficient or risk losing out in the bigger picture. This also must be said, that I feel that the government should not hold back free enterprises just to protect the interests of government linked companies (GLCs). The spirit of privitisation in industries and embrace of innovation should be embraced and not frowned upon. This is an age that calls and demands brave leadership or we will find ourselves deteriorating into an economy lagging behind in ASEAN.

When I write about my Labu journey, you will see how this post is so relevant to what we are all facing in Malaysia. When young innovative bright companies are held back back by slow moving inefficient monopolies, what happens is we simply lose great ideas and talent to our competitors the world. Are we content to only play second fiddle and fall behind all the time?

15 comments

skydreamer from Australia wroteon Feb 23, 2009 at 18:32
As a non- Malaysian. I was quite surprise that Malaysian are quite patriotic (I only know the Aussies and the American are really passion and loyal to their own country.) Also, is hard to leave a comment on this bloging which is more "Malayan".

As i saw your heading to lead the company. I do want to be part of a company who would let staff to work in different department as what you said. But wasn't that a bit risky or even a bit of wasting time on their career life. Although i would love to be those kind of people who can change the job.

Also, i am really pleased that you get a balance point for recruiting people for your firms, since some people are too patrotic or even racist, which couldn't make the right decision which best fit the job. Because as i knew, there are still people recruiting people regarding to their nationality and background... etc.

But regarding to your comment on Temasek, Although is a bit political to say, but i don't think Temasek was a outstanding company in the global market. They are kind of a monopoly in Singapore. (Even Maquaire Group in Australia, although they don't have a political background as Temasek does.) In certain extent, i even felt they are a bit "government control", which is on the opposite direction with global trade. Although Temasek wasn't the only firm i want to point out, even Chinalco was similar was well. They are too nationalize. Anyway, is good to hear they found Chip Goodyear, an experienced CEO for this important role!!

Hopefully, Temasek will became more wide nationality and became more clear to the public. ( I won't talk to much about it, because i still want to go to Singapore later on in my life!! Ha............)

As you might know, a firm wasn't a "one man team", is like soccer, Man U won't success if they only have C. Ronaldo. If the other players are far under his skills, Man U won't be able to get anywhere, that's why they bought players from whereelse to support C. Ronaldo or other players to gain the success. Also, Youth training are really important as well.

(P.S: I am not C. Ronaldo's fans and i am not saying Man U can't play good soccer without him since i put him as the main character in the case above.)

Back into your case, AirAsia need the best people from all over the world, not just one good leader. Also training programme are need for Malaysian as well. That's the only way to built a successful team for Air Asia or any firms it might be.

So, Tony. How's the Man U sponsership going?? Can't wait for more news!!!
kitaro_allaboutmoney from Malaysia wroteon Feb 23, 2009 at 18:58
hi Datuk, meritocracy and free competition? nice to hear but is that possible in this country? (hiding behind the government,monopolies & protectionism) this is nt only happen in our country but threw out the world,alot of multi million potential company die because of this,alot of talented malaysian gone because of this,our goverment know very well about this,bt.....!im hapi because you people concern about this,thank you very much. all about money. bye.
royaltodd from Malaysia wroteon Feb 23, 2009 at 20:59
kitaro_allaboutmoney highlighted some important points. The people from the first class world (business & usually it means military as well) know well about this -- meritocracy, because they cant afford to lose even 1 sen or 1 of their army. But, in reality, in the 2nd class world (politic), not to point to those beyond the border, how many of them know or care about meritocracy? Of course, we do need someone who dares to speak up and has broader mind like Datuk Nazir. With his special position, his voice would be much more effective than anyone of us. And if he really does mean it, he might make some constructive changes for the future of our nation and for the great of good, he should be. Sometime, I just feel like you guys (the business tycoons and entrepreneurs) are placed in the wrong world. Why dont be like this, let you be the Transportation Minister, let Datuk Nazir and Tan Sri Teh be the Finance Minister, etc etc..Just wondering how Malaysia will be within this one or two decades?
royaltodd from Malaysia wroteon Feb 23, 2009 at 22:25
Hey, Tony, I really seriously meant it, about those from 1st class world filling up the minister posts. Just imagine, for example Singapore, it would not be like it is today if all those original lawyers, doctors, engineers and other professionals remained to stick with their respective fields. Without scarifying their own interest for the nation, showed up to manage the country, Singapore hardly made it. MM Lee knows that I am telling the truth if he sees this comment. According to him (when he tried to convince one of his talented friend to quit his own profession and join him to manage the nation but the friend keeps giving excuses that he couldnt pay off the loan and etc if he quit..), Lee asked if we dont have a strong government and well managed country, are you still able to run your business as usual? Now, for a great business empire or for the sake of our beloved nation? To quote you, 1. We demand brave leadership! 2. Now is a golden opportunity to embrace change! Come on! People from the 1st class world!
cariyoyo from Malaysia wroteon Feb 24, 2009 at 09:34
Dear All, It is definitely refreshing to hear that Nazir Razak had made the call for the abolishment of NEP which is being implemented for too long already. The call, although should have been made at least ten or fifteen years earlier, is nonetheless, welcomed and breath new airs into the Malaysian economy. However, one must reconcile with the fact that such a call had been made incessantly in the past but fell on deaf ears and not to mention the political rhetorics and racial discord raised by ultra Malay leaders in UMNO. In other words, any attempt to abolish NEP would have first got to pass these ultra Malay leaders in UMNO who probably think NEP is a God-gift clutch to them. We can only remember very well how they ridiculed Dato Seri Ong Tee Keat, who made the call of abolishing NEP just several months ago. He is now quiet and excuse himself on rigorously discussing about the pros and cons of this archaic policy. He might have been fired at the Cabinet meeting for not knowing what to talk to the public on government' policies. Perhaps, there are a few sacred policies which no one except high ranking war lords in UMNO could only discuss them to public. In other words, NEP is a sacred cow to UMNO. The current financial meltdown has clearly demonstrated to all and sundry that all nations in the world have grown to be quite dependent on one another. This is to be expected in a globalized world and open economy system that most nations had openly embraced in the past decade or so. In order to survive in such an environment, we have to be efficient, not just on cost but in all aspect of the business. This is no rocket science technology and we all know that in a sheltered economy like Malaysia in the recent past, one can afford some inefficiencies and weaknesses. It would be a different ball game altogether for Malaysia going forward as we compete with China, India, Vietnam, Indonesia, Eastern Europe, Latin America and even a few African nations. What Malaysia can now offer with unique upper hand is the oil palm and a few rubber related industries. Certainly not in electronics nor in high technology nor in labour intensive basic assembling operation. Malaysia has lost many years of important years which were needed to prepare ourselves for this battle i.e. the real battle in an even playing field. Many Malays biz people are pleasantly new to all this.
cariyoyo from Malaysia wroteon Feb 24, 2009 at 15:24
Dear All, I have just completed reading an article on the interview with UMNO Youth President hopeful, Dato Khir Toyo and guess it is noteworthy for all and sundry to know that if elected, he will defend the NEP policy so as to ensure no marginalization of the Malays in all sectors. Interestingly, the other two aspirants for the Youth President post had voiced similar rhetorics and they have all voiced them loud and clear. Another candidate for the number two post in UMNO, Ali Rustam, had also promised to defend this policy so as to ensure the progress and properity of Malaysia going forward. The Wanita Chief, Rafidah Aziz, who is now having a run for her money to retain the post, had also asked the Americans to leave Malaysia if they are not too happy with the affirmative programme and we are yet to sign the FTA. This was a comment in her capacity as the former Trade and Industry Supremo then. The point which I am trying to put forward to all and sundry is that UMNO will never surrender this sacred policy in exchange of meritocracy. But perhaps would consider meritocracy ala-Malaysia like the one adopted in the admission of university students. It is indeed a sad day for Malaysia as we now stand competing with the weaker peers of Asia like Cambodia, Laos, Nepal and Bangladesh. We were once standing shoulder to shoulder with Singapore, Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong. Hell, to even rub a few sprinkle of salt into it, we were once the second most thriving economy in Asia after Japan when first achieving Merdeka. Something must have got terribly wrong since then as we were blessed with abundance of natural resources and rich pool of talented citizens. We boast to be the best English speaking country in Asia, rivalling Singapore then. These are nothing but all facts that probably we may not want to hear. We are somewhat living in denial.
raveendran from Malaysia wroteon Feb 24, 2009 at 19:07
Abolish NEP? Progressive idea but politically I don't think the idea will be implemented. Frankly speaking the objective of NEP was good but it was hijacked by politicians to retain their political power. The concept of NEP was to eradicate poverty irrespective of race or religion but then it was never implemented in genuine way. Later the educated citizens align to the ruling party have hijacked the policy to enrich their self and those in kampung was left with noting. This are the politcians who will rise high to defend the so-called economy policy to develop the community. For the long run, the policy have maked the community become disabled mentally. We have lost our brains. Total reform needed in-order to rejuvenate Malaysian and one of it is to invest in education. If we can do this in our education system then I believe we can stand on par with our neighbours especially Singapore after one generations otherwise forget about it. We shall have the minimum quota for the education and the rest shall be open for meritocracy system.
ferdinand v zeppelin from Malaysia wroteon Feb 24, 2009 at 21:41
In these day and age, many would frankly recognize that democracy can be no more than aspiration, and have rule not so much by the people as by the cleverest people; not an aristocracy of birth, not a plutocracy of wealth, but a true meritocracy of talent. As for protectionism, the following quote says it all..."Let me just be blunt. Protectionism is the crack cocaine of economics. It may provide a high. It's addictive and it leads to economic death," Dallas Federal Reserve President Richard Fisher
marvin_the_maverick from Malaysia wroteon Feb 24, 2009 at 23:50
ha ha ha ha... remember someone was appointed temporarily to the top of PKNS?
cheanoi from Malaysia wroteon Feb 26, 2009 at 00:19
Dear all, Lets see Tony's logic can work out in Malaysia or not. According to current siatuation in Malaysia,assume that, NEP=1970 policy ----(i) NEP=current Malaysia politician thinking&power----(ii) Meritocracy=ungrading country economy----(iii) conclusion 1, (i) = (ii) current Malaysia Politician thinking&Power = 1970 policy in Malaysia ,Politic > Economy, so, current malaysia politician thinking&Power > upgrading country economy and from (ii) and (iii),conclusion 2: NEP > Meritocracy So, total conclusion is: In malaysia, one should overcome politician power, which is folowing 1970 policy before he can implement meritocracy to improve country economy.
chris vince from Malaysia wroteon Mar 01, 2009 at 12:35
Tony,

We have many instances about Meritocracy and Free competition being mentioned by leaders today. The question is are the leaders themselves committed to what they say? If yes are there any follow ups and enforcement? Most of the time it just stops there. In Malaysia, we have to the right talents but no chance given. Why? It's simple there is always in one way or the other some element of "favoritism" exist which is a hindrance. This then turns into politics. It boils down to how discipline our leaders are - so can AirAsia lead by example?
aio193 from Malaysia wroteon Mar 04, 2009 at 22:49
how about ethics? Under the table money.. a cut on the deal to help get it approved.. misused government grants... i can go on and on and on
desmond_hm_sim from Malaysia wroteon Mar 05, 2009 at 09:58
Dear Tony, I appreciate your view into what Datuk Nazir mentioned. I hope he meant what he said. For a country like Malaysia to behave and accept total meritocracy and free competition will take many years. For Temasek case, the singaporean still believed in bringing the best from the Fortune 500 companies, yet they still don't believed their local expertise. In another angle, are we saying Singaporean has no such expertise and experiences? Why Chip Goodyear is selected why not Larry Bossidy? To me I hope high respect in terms how SIngapore become today. They are far developed in policies, rules, regulations. Their education systems constantly being reviewed.They should have given CEO position to local, not all ang moh can run any Asian companies well, but there are few exceptions. Back home, what we Malaysian need is a total paradigm shift! We are still behaving complacent feeling comfortably in our own space. Today the world has change, they are not independant anymore, we are interdependant. We have many talents, I'm hearing a lot of them do not want to stay here in near future. To be honest, we have the greatest talent pool, young, energetic in our countries. We just ridiculed them and thinking the foreign talent would be preferable. We can no longer think efficient anymore as we are almost on par with Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia. The efficient market have been dominated by China and India. The future will be there. Mr. Gerald Celente will tell you more about it. We need to learn and move to effectiveness and thats the path will determine we will reach greatness of all. Once we achieved effectiveness the efficiency will come along. However, if we choose efficiency, we'll lose effectiveness. Bottomline, we need a cultural change. We need to eliminate all monopolies, bureaucracy, nepotism and other man-made obstacles. Only then we can have free competition, everybody irregarless skin color, background, education, experiences, religion, belief systems and ethnic will have their fair share of chances. These cultural happened in U.S as well. They encouraged free competition and free market for entrepreneurs. In Human Need Psychology, we are talking about getting it SIGNIFICANCE, GROWTH & CONTRIBUTION.
sputjam from Malaysia wroteon May 25, 2009 at 10:35
Tony was joking when he applauds Temasick for appointing Goodyear. He starts 1st October 2009. am sure there are more abled and patriotic singaporeans who can handle the job as well if not better than Goodyear. Why was a foreigner appointed to replace the current CEO of Temasick? Is it becasue when the present CEO was appointed, LKY insisted that her appoinment was based on meritocracy although Ho ching is the 2nd wife of Lee hsien Loong and LKY's daughter-in-law. (The first wife was a Malaysian doctor who committed suicide after their second child was born with down's syndrome). So based on meritocratic principle, there should not be another singaporean who is more capable than Ho Ching and therefore a foreigner has to fill the place. While we are looking up to singapore, singaporeans are desserting their island paradise in record numbers and migrating to countries such as australia, new zealand, the US and canada. Reason? Their own govenrment has abandoned them and favoured the foreign proffesionals and life on the island is too stressful, begining with the educaion system. They do not want their kids to suffer as their parents did. Most migrate wanting their kids to have a less stressful life. After migrating, the father may return to singapore to work as a foreign PR.
gruben84 from Malaysia wroteon Jun 07, 2010 at 15:18
Dear Datuk Tony just a reply to ur SIA post, I think we young malaysian have the ability to excel as good as Singapore however we are not given the chance and are surpressed. I have a blue ocean strategy for AirAsia to leap across any airline in the world. Maybe AirAsia should consider looking into budget freight and forwarding as you guy are already flying longhaul and all over the world. As a graduate from LSE you should be well aware a perfectly competitive market will allow for the most effecient and effective companies to survive and consumer reep the end benefit. That is what Singapore has based their country's the fundamental on. Datuk you have inspired young malaysian like me. I think a joint venture or assistance with West Port would make this a reality

Leave a comment

Be sure to sign up for my personal blog if you haven't already. Even if you have a member account on AirAsia.com, this is necessary. Once you've done that, you can leave your comment. Thanks!

Please login to leave a comment.
 
 

Welcome

Hi guys. Thanks for stopping by. This is where I plan to share my ideas, thoughts and observations on a variety of topics with anyone who cares to listen. There's just so much to say these days and with new developments in areas of sports such as the 1Lotus team and the ABL and in new ventures of Tune Talk and more to come, stay tuned. Cheers!
Opinions expressed here and in any corresponding comments are the views and opinions of Tony Fernandes, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the AirAsia and Tune Groups of Companies.

User Login

Search

Gallery

thumbthumbthumb
thumbthumbthumb
thumbthumbthumb

 

Tony’s Channel

 Check out my videos

User Login